| Angular | Spring MVC | |
| Theming | PrimeNG tools allow to switch themes dynamically, have different themes based on criteria. Creating new these could be an extremely easy task. | |
| Transaction Performance | Combined with Node.js provides way to achieve high-performant transactions | |
| Ecosystem | Angular ecosystem is growing rapidly | Spring MVC ecosystem is growing on less pace |
| Hosting | Being a JavaScript based framework, Angular components have wider acceptability on hosting choices including in cloud space | |
| Existing Applications | For adopting Angular, all of UI and Middle layer modules will have to be re-written | If there are some components of system already in Spring, using Spring further would enable ease of maintenance |
| Feature rich applications | Aimed towards smaller, multiple transactions | Spring MVC would perform better for feature-rich, heavier, bigger applications |
| Application Maintenance | Small to mid-size applications are easier to maintain, enhance with Angular due to its predefined component-based structure | Creating and maintaining large-sized application is easier with Spring MVC |
| Talent Availability | Not so easy to find resources skilled in Angular | Easier to find resources skilled in Spring MVC |
| UI Element Binding | Angular has two-way binding; meaning a value changed in UI will be automatically reflecting in the code-behind | Spring MVC has one way binding from code-behind to UI; meaning any change of value on UI will have to have its mechanism created to send value to code-behind |
Internet posts and blogs